-
- Erik E Folch, Amit K Mahajan, Catherine L Oberg, Fabien Maldonado, Eric Toloza, William S Krimsky, Scott Oh, Mark R Bowling, Sadia Benzaquen, Charles M Kinsey, Atul C Mehta, Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy, Javier Flandes, Kelvin Lau, Ganesh Krishna, Michael A Nead, Felix Herth, Alejandro A Aragaki-Nakahodo, Emanuela Barisione, Sandeep Bansal, Dragos Zanchi, Michael Zgoda, Peter O Lutz, Robert J Lentz, Christopher Parks, Mario Salio, Kenneth Perret, Colleen Keyes, Gregory P LeMense, John D Hinze, Adnan Majid, Merete Christensen, Jordan Kazakov, Gonzalo Labarca, Ernest Waller, Michael Studnicka, Catalina V Teba, and Sandeep J Khandhar.
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. Electronic address: efolch@mgh.harvard.edu.
- Chest. 2020 Jul 1; 158 (1): 393-400.
BackgroundTransbronchial lung biopsies are commonly performed for a variety of indications. Although generally well tolerated, complications such as bleeding do occur. Description of bleeding severity is crucial both clinically and in research trials; to date, there is no validated scale that is widely accepted for this purpose. Can a simple, reproducible tool for categorizing the severity of bleeding after transbronchial biopsy be created?MethodsUsing the modified Delphi method, an international group of bronchoscopists sought to create a new scale tailored to assess bleeding severity among patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy with transbronchial lung biopsies. Cessation criteria were specified a priori and included reaching > 80% consensus among the experts or three rounds, whichever occurred first.ResultsThirty-six expert bronchoscopists from eight countries, both in academic and community practice settings, participated in the creation of the scale. After the live meeting, two iterations were made. The second and final scale was vetted by all 36 participants, with a weighted average of 4.47/5; 53% were satisfied, and 47% were very satisfied. The panel reached a consensus and proposes the Nashville Bleeding Scale.ConclusionsThe use of a simplified airway bleeding scale that can be applied at bedside is an important, necessary tool for categorizing the severity of bleeding. Uniformity in reporting clinically significant airway bleeding during bronchoscopic procedures will improve the quality of the information derived and could lead to standardization of management. In addition to transbronchial biopsies, this scale could also be applied to other bronchoscopic procedures, such as endobronchial biopsy or endobronchial ultrasound-guided needle aspiration.Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.