• Vamseedharan Muthukumar, Praveen Kumar Arumugam, and Rahul Bamal.
• Department of Burns, Plastic & Maxillofacial Surgery, VM Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India. Electronic address: drvamseedharan@gmail.com.
• Burns. 2020 Aug 1; 46 (5): 1060-1065.

IntroductionBurns are a worldwide problem with majority of them occurring in low and middle-income countries. The hurdles in treatment of burns in the resource restricted setting are unique and challenging. The role of intravenous antibiotics in reducing mortality and morbidity related to infection and sepsis has not been studied extensively in the Indian sub-continent.Materials And MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary burn care center in India over a period of six months with follow up of one month from the day of burn injury.ResultsData from a total of 157 patients were collected and analysed. In Prophylaxis group (n = 77), sepsis was detected in 33 patients and 38 patients expired. In No Prophylaxis group (n = 80), sepsis was detected in 37 patients and 40 patients expired. In Inhalational burns subgroup, patients belonging to Prophylaxis group (n = 30) had 20 patients diagnosed with pneumonia while 22 patients did not survive till 30th post burn day. Patients in No Prophylaxis group who had inhalational burns were 38 in number. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 29 of them while 27 did not survive till 30th post burn day. In Pneumonia subgroup, patients belonging to Prophylaxis group had lower mortality rate as compared to No Prophylaxis group.ConclusionOur study does not support the routine usage of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with burn injuries, but their administration can be considered in certain specific subgroups like patients with inhalational burns and patients developing pneumonia. Pneumonia is an independent risk factor for mortality when no antibiotic prophylaxis is used in burn patients.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…