-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl · Jan 1975
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialA double-blind comparison of single doses of etidocaine 1 % and bupivacaine 0.5 % during continuous lumbar epidural block in obstetrics.
- J Wilson.
- Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1975 Jan 1; 60: 97-9.
AbstractA double-blind investigation of some of the effects of etidocaine 1 % and bupivacaine 0.5 % was undertaken in patients in established labour. The results showed that the duration of bupivacaine was significantly longer than that of etidocaine, while the number of patients with good analgesia was equal in both groups. Motor blockade was less obvious in those patients receiving bupivacaine, but in neither group was this a finding of importance. At 5 minutes the Apgar scores of neonates from both groups were similar and any differences seen at 1 minute may be attributable to factors other than the drugs on trial.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.