• Mathilde Gaumé, Jules Descamps, Julia Donadio, Marc-Antoine Rousseau, and Patrick Boyer.
• Orthopedics Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. Electronic address: mathilde.gaume@aphp.fr.
• Injury. 2020 Apr 1; 51 (4): 964-970.

BackgroundAdult isolated ulnar shaft fractures (IUSF) are rare. There remains a need to establish the best methods to manage these fractures. The aim of this study was to compare two forms of treatment for IUSF: intramedullary stabilization by k-wire (IMF) versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation by plating (ORIF), in order to identify differences in clinical (1) and radiological outcomes (2), as well as comparative costs (3).HypothesisThe hypothesis of this study was assessing whether intramedullary stabilization was as feasible as plating in the treatment of isolated ulnar shaft fractures in clinical practice.Patients And MethodsA retrospective analysis was undertaken on patients diagnosed IUSF between January 2015 and March 2017 with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. They were treated with IMF (group 1) or ORIF (group 2). Demographic information, clinical outcomes and complications were collected. Cost, including implant cost, operative time, sterilization and inpatient stay were compared. Radiographs were reviewed to evaluate axial angulation, shortening, displacement and residual deformity.Results54 patients with a mean age of 41.2 years were treated by IMF (27/54) and ORIF (27/54). The mechanism of injury included high-energy (55%) and low-energy falls (45%). AO/OTA 2018 fracture classification was simple (39/54), wedge (14/54) and complex (1/54). The locations were 37/54 (70%) distal third and 17/54 (30%) mid-shaft fractures. There was no significant difference pre and post-operatively between the 2 groups regarding radiologic criteria. 3 cases of non-union, 4 delay-union and 1 regional complex syndrome occurred in group 2. No complication was reported in group 1. The function determined by range of motion (ROM) at wrist and elbow was excellent in 72% (group 1) and 80% (group2), 18% satisfactory in group 1 and 20% in group 2. There was no difference for QuickDASH and pain. Implant removal was necessary in 70% of patients without sequelae in nailing, 11% after plating. Average operation time was 29 ± 5 min for ORIF and 18 ± 6 min for IMF. Total estimated cost per patient was 3678.4€ for IMF and 7051.9€ for ORIF.ConclusionsCompared with ORIF, IMF significantly reduced the operation time and cost with lower complications.Type Of StudyRetrospective study.Type Of ProofLevel 4.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…