• Johanna C Moore, Bayert Salverda, Michael Lick, Carolina Rojas-Salvador, Nicolas Segal, Guillaume Debaty, and Keith G Lurie.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: Johanna.moore@hcmed.org.
• Resuscitation. 2020 May 1; 150: 232823-28.

Aim Of The StudyElevation of the head and thorax (HUP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to double brain blood flow with increased cerebral perfusion pressures (CerPP) after active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR with an impedance threshold device (ITD). However, the optimal angle for HUP CPR is unknown.MethodsIn Study A, different angles were assessed (20°, 30°, 40°), each randomized over 5-min periods of ACD + ITD CPR, after 8 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation in an anesthetized swine model. Based upon Study A, Study B was performed, where animals were randomized to 1 of 2 sequences: 20°, 30°, 40° or 40°, 30°, 20° with a similar protocol. The primary endpoint was CerPP for both studies.ResultsIn Study A, no optimal HUP angle was observed in 18 pigs. CerPPs for 30° and 40° (mmHg, mean ± SD) were equivalent (44 ± 22 and 47 ± 26, p = 0.18). However, CerPP appeared higher when 40° HUP was performed during the last 5-min of CPR, suggestive of a sequence effect. For Study B, after 17 min of CPR, CerPP (mmHg) were higher with the 20°, 30°, 40° sequence: 60 ± 17 versus 33 ± 18 (p = 0.035).ConclusionsNo optimal HUP CPR angle was observed. However, controlled progressive elevation of the head and thorax during CPR is more beneficial than an absolute angle or height to maximize CerPP. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal rate of rise during HUP ACD + ITD CPR.Institutional Protocol Number17-06.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…