• Fernando Godinho Zampieri, Flavio Araújo, Renato Hideo Nakagawa Santos, and Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti.
• Instituto de Pesquisa, HCor-Hospital do Coração - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
• Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Jul 1; 30 (3): 264-285.

ObjectiveTo investigate the existing capacity for renal replacement therapy and site-specific practices for managing acute kidney injury at centers participating in the BaSICS trial.MethodsA questionnaire was provided to the chairs of 61 intensive care units enrolled in a randomized clinical trial in Brazil. A total of 124 physicians completed the questionnaire.ResultsApproximately 15% of the patients admitted to the analyzed intensive care units received renal replacement therapy at the time of data collection. At least one renal replacement method was available in all of the analyzed units. Continuous methods were available more frequently at the private units than at the public units. The time from indication to onset of treatment was longer at the public units than at private units. The main obstacles to treatment initiation at public intensive care units were related to the availability of equipment and personnel, while the main bottleneck at private units was the nephrologist assessment. A considerable proportion of the participants stated that they would change their approach to renal replacement therapy if there were no limitations on the availability of methods in their units.ConclusionThere was wide variation in the availability of resources for renal replacement therapy and in the management of acute kidney injury in Brazilian intensive care units. This information should be taken into account when planning clinical trials focused on this topic in Brazil.

11 keywords...

hide…