• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Sep 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Intercostal Nerve Block for Post-Minithoracotomy Acute Pain Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    • Silvia Fiorelli, Giulio Leopizzi, Cecilia Menna, Leonardo Teodonio, Mohsen Ibrahim, Erino Angelo Rendina, Alberto Ricci, Roberto Alberto De Blasi, Monica Rocco, and Domenico Massullo.
    • Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: silvia.fiorelli@uniroma1.it.
    • J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2020 Sep 1; 34 (9): 2421-2429.

    ObjectiveSeveral nerve block procedures are available for post-thoracotomy pain management.DesignIn this randomized trial, the authors aimed to determine whether the analgesic effect of preoperative ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) might be superior to that of intraoperative intercostal nerve block (ICNB) in pain control in patients undergoing minithoracotomy.SettingUniversity hospital.ParticipantsSixty consecutive adult patients scheduled to undergo minithoracotomy for lung resection were enrolled.InterventionsPatients were allocated randomly in a 1:1 ratio to receive either single-shot ESPB or ICNB.Measurements And Main ResultsThe primary outcome was the intensity of postoperative pain at rest, assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were (1) dynamic NRS values (during cough); (2) perioperative analgesic requirements; (3) patient satisfaction, on the basis of a verbal scale (Likert scale); and (4) respiratory muscle strength, considering the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) variation from baseline. The ESPB group showed lower postoperative static and dynamic NRS values than the ICNB group (p < 0.05). Total remifentanil consumption and requirements for additional analgesics were lower in the ESPB group (p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher in the ESPB group (p < 0.001). A significant overall time effect was found in MIP and MEP variation (p < 0.001); ESPB values were higher at all points, reaching a statistically significant level at the first and sixth hours for MIP, and at the first, 12th, 24th, and 48th hours for MEP (p < 0.05).ConclusionsESPB was demonstrated to provide superior analgesia, lower perioperative analgesic requirements, better patient satisfaction, and less respiratory muscle strength impairment than ICNB in patients undergoing minithoracotomy.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.