• Spine · Aug 2020

    Comparison of Perioperative Complications in Anterior Decompression with Fusion and Posterior Decompression with Fusion for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nation-Wide Inpatient Database.

    • Toshitaka Yoshii, Shingo Morishita, Hiroyuki Inose, Masato Yuasa, Takashi Hirai, Atsushi Okawa, Kiyohide Fushimi, and Takeo Fujiwara.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
    • Spine. 2020 Aug 15; 45 (16): E1006-E1012.

    Study DesignA retrospective comparative study.ObjectiveTo compare the perioperative complications and costs of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).Summary Of Background DataSurgical treatment of cervical OPLL has a high risk of various complications. ADF and PDF are effective for the treatment of cervical OPLL; however, few studies have compared the two procedures in terms of the perioperative surgical complications.MethodsPatients undergoing ADF and PDF for cervical OPLL from 2010 to 2016 were identified in a nation-wide inpatient database. We investigated systemic and local complications, length of hospital stay, costs for hospitalization, reoperation, and mortality. Propensity score was calculated from patients' characteristics and preoperative comorbidities, and one to one matching was performed.ResultsPropensity score-matching produced 854 pairs of patients who underwent ADF and PDF. The rate of at least one systemic complication was significantly higher in the ADF group (P = 0.004). The incidence rates of postoperative respiratory failure (P = 0.034) and dysphagia (P = 0.008) were significantly higher in the ADF group. The rates of pneumonia (P = 0.06) and hoarseness (P = 0.08) also tended to be higher in the ADF group. However, no difference was found in the mortality rate (P = 0.22). In the local complications, spinal fluid leakage was significantly higher in the ADF group (P < 0.001). However, blood transfusion rate was significantly higher in the PDF group (P = 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the PDF group (P < 0.001) and the cost for hospitalization was greater in the PDF group (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe present study demonstrated that perioperative complications, such as respiratory failure, dysphagia, and spinal fluid leakage, were more common in the ADF group. However, hospital stay was longer in the PDF group, and the cost for hospitalization was greater in the PDF group.Level Of Evidence3.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.