• Burns · Sep 2020

    Multicenter Study

    Feasibility and impact of the implementation of a clinical scale-based sedation-analgesia protocol in severe burn patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. A before-after bi-center study.

    • Raphaël Cinotti, Noémie Besnard, Luc Desmedt, FlochRonan LeRLAnesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospital of Nantes, Hôtel Dieu, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, Nantes 44093, France., Pierre Perrot, Farid Bekara, Kada Klouche, Romaric Larcher, Pierre-Joachim Mahé, Denis Frasca, Karim Asehnoune, Boris Jung, and Antoine Roquilly.
    • Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hôpital Guillaume et René Laennec, University Hospital of Nantes, Boulevard Jacques Monod, Saint-Herblain 44800, France. Electronic address: raphael.cinotti@chu-nantes.fr.
    • Burns. 2020 Sep 1; 46 (6): 1310-1317.

    BackgroundSevere burn patients undergo prolonged administration of sedatives and analgesics for burn care. There are currently no guidelines for the dose adaptation of sedation-analgesia in severe burn patients.MethodsWe performed a before-after 2-center study to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of a sedation-analgesia scale-based protocol in severely burned patients receiving ≥24h of invasive mechanical ventilation. Before the intervention, continuous infusion of hypnotic and morphine derivatives was continued. During the Intervention phase, general anesthesia was relayed from day 1 by RASS/BPS-titrated continuous infusion of hypnotic and morphine derivatives and with short half-life drugs adminstered for daily burn dressings. The primary outcome was the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU.ResultsEighty-seven (46.2%) patients were included in the Control phase and 101 (53.7%) in the Intervention phase. The median burned cutaneous surface was 20% [11%-38%] and median ABSI was 7 [5-9]. The durations of hypnotic and opioid infusions were not statistically different between the 2 phases (8 days [2-24] vs. 6 days [2-17] (P=0.3) and 17 days [4-32] vs. 8 days [3-23] (P=0.06), respectively). The duration of mechanical ventilation was 14 days [3-29] in the Control phase and 7 days [2-24] in the Intervention phase (P=0.7). When taking into account the competition between mortality and weaning from mechanical ventilation, we found no significant difference between the 2 phases (Gray test, P=0.4). The time-series analysis showed no difference for the duration of mechanical ventilation in the Intervention phase (P=0.6). Eighteen (20.7%) patients died in the Control phase, and 18 (18%) in the Intervention phase (P=0.6).ConclusionScale-based lightening of continuous sedation-analgesia with repeated short general anesthesia for dressing is feasible in severe burn patients but failed to demonstrate a decrease in the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.