• Dan M Drzymalski, Katelyn Ward, Josephine M Hernandez, Joyce Hoot, Shiu-Chung Au, Fei-Shiuann Clarissa Yang, and Ruben J Azocar.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box 298, Boston, MA, USA. dandrzymalski@gmail.com.
• Can J Anaesth. 2020 May 1; 67 (5): 560-567.

PurposeApplication of adhesive tape to the eyelids during general anesthesia decreases the risk of corneal abrasion but may increase the risk of eyelid injury. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in eyelid erythema when covering the eyelid with either Tegaderm™ or an EyeGard®.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-face study of patients undergoing general anesthesia at an urban tertiary care academic medical centre. Each patient was randomized to having one eyelid covered with Tegaderm and the other with EyeGard. Photographs were taken prior to extubation and evaluated by three dermatologists. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative eyelid erythema. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of corneal abrasion and patient satisfaction.ResultsA total of 151 patients were included in our final analysis. Erythema was present on 117 (77%) eyelids covered with Tegaderm and 105 (70%) eyelids covered with EyeGard (% difference, 8; 95% confidence interval, 2 to 14; P = 0.03). No corneal abrasions were reported. The median [interquartile range] patient satisfaction score with eyelid condition was similar with Tegaderm vs EyeGard (5 [5-5] vs 5 [5-5], respectively; P = 0.84).ConclusionWe found a small increase in postoperative eyelid erythema when using Tegaderm compared with EyeGard. While EyeGard could decrease the risk of eyelid erythema, this should be balanced against other potential benefits of Tegaderm such as protection from fluids leaking onto the cornea.Trial Registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03549429); registered 8 June, 2018.

11 keywords...

hide…