• Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Jun 2012

    Meta Analysis Comparative Study

    Which is the best alternative for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly?: A meta-analysis.

    • Hongwei Gao, Zhonghao Liu, Deguo Xing, and Mingzhi Gong.
    • Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Shandong, 250033, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
    • Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012 Jun 1; 470 (6): 1782-91.

    BackgroundTreatment of displaced femoral neck fractures includes internal fixation and arthroplasty. However, whether arthroplasty or internal fixation is the primary treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients remains a subject for debate. The literature contains conflicting evidence regarding rates of mortality, revision surgery, major postoperative complications, and function in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated either by internal fixation or arthroplasty (either hemiarthroplasty or THA).Questions/PurposeWe determined mortality, revision surgery rates, major surgical complications (which include infection, nonunion or early redisplacement, avascular necrosis, dislocation, loosening of the prosthesis, acetabular erosion, fracture below or around the implant, and other severe general complications such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), and function in patients treated with either internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing internal fixation and arthroplasty. We identified 20 RCTs with 4508 patients meeting all the criteria for eligibility. We performed a meta-analysis of the major complications, reoperations, function, pain, and mortality.ResultsCompared with internal fixation, arthroplasty reduced the risk of the major complications (95% CI, 0.21-0.54 for 1 year; 95% CI, 0.16-0.31 for 5 years) and the incidence of reoperation 1 to 5 years after surgery (95% CI, 0.15-0.34 for 1 year; 95% CI, 0.08-0.24 for 5 years), and provided better pain relief (95% CI, 0.34-0.72). Function was superior (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.79) for patients treated with arthroplasty than for patients treated by internal fixation. However, mortality 1 to 3 years after surgery was similar (95% CI, 0.96-1.23, p = 0.20 for 1 year; 95% CI, 0.91-1.17, p = 0.63 for 3 years).ConclusionsArthroplasty can reduce the risk of major complications and the incidence of reoperation compared with internal fixation, and provide better pain relief and function, but it does not reduce mortality.Level Of EvidenceLevel II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.