• Adeel Ilyas, Ching-Jen Chen, Dale Ding, Paul M Foreman, Thomas J Buell, Natasha Ironside, Davis G Taylor, M Yashar Kalani, Min S Park, Andrew M Southerland, and Bradford B Worrall.
• Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. Electronic address: adeelilyas@uabmc.edu.
• World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 1; 112: e355-e367.

BackgroundEndovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) is the standard of care for eligible patients presenting with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the outcomes between patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA) versus conscious sedation (CS) for these procedures.MethodsA literature review was performed to identify studies reporting the EMT outcomes of AIS patients who underwent GA or CS for the procedure. Baseline, treatment, and outcomes data were analyzed. Good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 3 months, and successful reperfusion was defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade of 2b-3.ResultsNine studies, comprising a total of 1379 patients treated with GA (n = 761) or CS (n = 618) for EMT, were included. Based on pooled data, GA achieved good outcome in 35% and successful reperfusion in 81%, whereas CS achieved good outcome in 41% and successful reperfusion in 75%. Meta-analyses showed no significant differences in the rates of good outcome (P = 0.51) or successful reperfusion (P = 0.39) between the GA and CS groups. The rates of pneumonia were significantly higher in the GA group (21% vs. 11%; P = 0.01).ConclusionsThe use of either GA or CS during EMT for patients with anterior circulation acute ELVO does not yield significantly different rates of functional independence at 3 months.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…