-
- P L Carlton.
- Neuropsychobiology. 1984 Jan 1; 12 (2-3): 158-72.
AbstractAnalysis of the mechanisms underlying the clinical effects of different drugs is a vital part of psychopharmacology. It is fair to say, however, that such analyses have thus far met with little success. This lack of success can be traced to a variety of sources that have flawed the analytical process itself. Detailed examination of these sources not only illuminates the nature of the flaws they engender, but suggests ways in which the analytic process can be modified so as to be a more fruitful one.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.