• A Fafaj, C C Petro, L Tastaldi, H Alkhatib, R AlMarzooqi, M A Olson, T G Stewart, A Prabhu, D Krpata, and M J Rosen.
• Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
• Br J Surg. 2020 Aug 1; 107 (9): 1123-1129.

BackgroundIncisional hernia repair with mesh improves long-term outcomes, but the ideal mesh position remains unclear. This study compared intraperitoneal versus retromuscular or preperitoneal sublay (RPS) mesh positions for open incisional hernia repairs.MethodsAll patients who had elective open incisional hernia repairs were identified retrospectively in the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative database. The primary outcome was the rate of 30-day surgical-site infection (SSI). Other outcomes of interest included 30-day surgical-site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), hernia-related quality-of-life survey (HerQLes) scores and long-term recurrence. A logistic model was used to generate propensity scores for mesh position using several clinically relevant co-variables. Regression models adjusting for propensity score and baseline characteristics were developed to assess the effect of mesh placement.ResultsA total of 4211 patients were included in the study population: 587 had intraperitoneal mesh and 3624 had RPS mesh. Analysis with propensity score adjustment provided no evidence for differences in SSOPI (odds ratio (OR) 0·79, 95 per cent c.i. 0·49 to 1·26) and SSI (OR 0·91, 0·50 to 1·67) rates or HerQLes scores at 30 days (OR 1·20, 0·79 to 1·82), or recurrence rates (hazard ratio 1·28, 0·90 to 1·82).ConclusionMesh position had no effect on short- or long-term outcomes, including SSOPI and SSI rates, HerQLes scores and long-term recurrence rates.© 2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

14 keywords...

hide…