-
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand · Oct 2014
Characteristics and outcome of unplanned out-of-institution births in Norway from 1999 to 2013: a cross-sectional study.
- Björn Gunnarsson, Alexander K Smárason, Eirik Skogvoll, and Sigurd Fasting.
- Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
- Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Oct 1; 93 (10): 1003-10.
ObjectiveTo study the incidence, maternal characteristics and outcome of unplanned out-of-institution births (= unplanned births) in Norway.DesignRegister-based cross-sectional study.PopulationAll births in Norway (n = 892 137) from 1999 to 2013 with gestational age ≥22 weeks.MethodsAnalysis of data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1999 to 2013. Unplanned births (n = 6062) were compared with all other births (reference group).ResultsThe annual incidence rate of unplanned births was 6.8/1000 births and remained stable during the period of study. Young multiparous women residing in remote municipalities were at the highest risk of experiencing unplanned births. The unplanned birth group had higher perinatal mortality rate for the period, 11.4/1000 compared with 4.9/1000 for the reference group (incidence rate ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.82-2.93, p < 0.001). Annual perinatal mortality rate for unplanned births did not change significantly (p = 0.80) but declined on average by 3% per year in the reference group (p < 0.001). The unplanned birth group had a lower proportion of live births in all birthweight categories. Live born neonates with a birthweight of 750-999 g in the unplanned birth group had a more than five times higher mortality rate during the first week of life, compared with reference births in the same birthweight category.ConclusionsUnplanned births are associated with adverse outcome. Excessive mortality is possibly caused by reduced availability of necessary medical interventions for vulnerable newborns out-of-hospital.© 2014 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.