• Laurence T Dunn, Michael O Fitzpatrick, Diana Beard, and Jennifer M Henry.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Univeristy of Glasgow, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, United Kingdom. ltd1x@udcf.gla.ac.uk
• J Trauma. 2003 Mar 1; 54 (3): 497-502.

BackgroundPatients who "talk and die" after head injury may represent a group who suffer delayed and therefore potentially preventable complications after injury. We have compared the clinical and pathologic features of patients who talk and die with those who "talk and live" after head injury.MethodsData collected prospectively by the Scottish Trauma Audit Group were used to identify patients with a head injury and classify them according to verbal response at admission to hospital. All "talking" patients in the catchment area of a regional neurosurgical center were selected and those who died were compared with those who survived.ResultsSeven hundred eighty-nine talking patients were identified. Seven hundred twenty-seven patients survived and 62 died. Patients who talked and died were older, had more severe extracranial injuries, had lower consciousness levels, and reached theater more quickly than those who talked and lived. Thirty-one of the patients that died had extra-axial hematomas.ConclusionEven with increased availability of computed tomographic scanning, some patients still talk and die after head injury.

17 keywords...

hide…