• Am J Sports Med · Aug 2015

    Decellularized Versus Fresh-Frozen Allografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vitro Study in a Rabbit Model.

    • Shikui Dong, Xiaoqiao Huangfu, Guoming Xie, Yang Zhang, Peng Shen, Xiaoxi Li, Jin Qi, and Jinzhong Zhao.
    • Department of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
    • Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug 1; 43 (8): 1924-34.

    BackgroundThe common fresh-frozen allografts that are used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions behave slower during the remodeling process and produce weaker tendon-bone integrations than do autografts. Decellularization of allogenic tendons results in a clean and porous collagen scaffold with low antigenicity and high compatibility, which may be more suitable for ACL reconstructions.HypothesisAllograft decellularization will result in a tissue structure with suitable mechanical characteristics for ACL reconstruction, thereby promoting graft remodeling and enhancing tendon-bone healing.Study DesignControlled laboratory study.MethodsDecellularized allograft tissues were prepared with a pH-modified decellularization process and evaluated for their biocompatibility and biomechanical character in vitro. Eighty New Zealand White rabbits were divided into 2 groups, with 40 in each group, to receive ACL reconstruction with either fresh-frozen (common) allografts or decellularized allografts on both knees. At 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively, the rabbits were euthanized for biomechanical testing, micro-computed tomography analysis, and histologic analysis.ResultsThe pH-modified decellularized allograft tissues kept excellent biocompatibility and biomechanical character during the in vitro study. Biomechanical testing indicated that the decellularized allograft had significantly higher ultimate load (P = .02) and stiffness (P = .01) levels than the common allograft at 12 weeks, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at any other time point. The micro-CT evaluation determined significantly higher bone mineral density (P < .01) in the decellularized allograft group than that in the common allograft group at 12 weeks, but no difference between the 2 groups was observed at any other time point. Regarding bone volume/total volume, there was no difference between the 2 groups at any time point. Fibroblast ingrowths, vascular formation, and connective tissue formation in the tendon-bone interface were better in the decellularized group within 8 weeks. New bone formation was more common in the decellularized allograft group. The collagen birefringence was restored more quickly in the decellularized allograft group than in the common allograft group at all time points.ConclusionThe use of pH-modified decellularized allografts compared with the common allografts resulted in better cellularity, vascularity, collagen matrix remolding, new bone formation around the graft, enhanced tendon-bone healing, and higher ultimate failure load and stiffness of the graft after ACL reconstruction in the rabbit model.Clinical RelevanceThe pH-modified decellularized allograft may be a better graft option than the common fresh-frozen allograft for knee ligament reconstructions.© 2015 The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…