• Pain Med · Sep 2020

    Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Controlled Substance Review Committee on Opioid Prescribing in a Community Health Center.

    • Holly C Bourgeois, Rachel C Proteau, Cassandra V Vielma, Daniel M Hartung, and Adriane N Irwin.
    • Community Health Centers of Benton and Linn Counties, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
    • Pain Med. 2020 Sep 1; 21 (9): 1840-1846.

    ObjectiveTo describe recommendations made by an interdisciplinary controlled substance committee and acceptance by primary care providers.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingMultisite federally qualified health center using an interdisciplinary committee to provide patient-specific recommendations to prescribers with patients using prescription opioids and other controlled substances.SubjectsPatients prescribed long-term opioids.MethodsWe identified and characterized committee recommendations to prescribers between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. We manually reviewed electronic medical records to determine if recommendations were accepted at eight months. The primary outcome was the overall acceptance rate of recommendations. Secondary outcomes were the acceptance of recommendations to reduce opioid doses and change in opioid dose from baseline.ResultsThe committee made 337 recommendations for 94 patients. Of those, 169 recommendations (50.1%) were accepted within eight months. The most common recommendation was to change opioid prescribing (N = 53, 56.4%), but recommendations varied. For patients with a recommendation to change opioid prescribing, this was accepted in 31 of 53 patients (58.5%). Overall, opioid doses decreased from 60 morphine equivalents per day (interquartile range [IQR] = 27.5-135, range = 5-1,260) at baseline to 40 morphine equivalents per day (IQR = 15-105, range = 0-1,260) at eight months (P < 0.001).ConclusionsAn interdisciplinary committee was well positioned to offer primary care providers with nonopioid options to manage chronic nonmalignant pain and provide support in reducing opioid doses. About half of recommendations were accepted by primary care providers. Future research should focus on strategies to improve the utility of this approach and its impact on clinical outcomes.© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.