• G Ryan Rieser and Joseph T Moskal.
• Virginia Tech - Carilion Clinic, Institute for Orthopaedics and Neurosciences, Roanoke, VA.
• J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun 1; 33 (6): 1652-1655.

BackgroundWith increasing rates of virulent drug resistant organisms, MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) decolonization has been demonstrated to decrease infection rates. Recent research has shown the antiseptic povidone-iodine to be equally effective and potentially cost saving compared to intranasal mupirocin. This study's purpose is to evaluate the incidence of MRSA colonization in a more rural community-based population, rates of infection on a mupirocin decolonization protocol, and develop a cost analysis model to compare costs of utilizing povidone-iodine.MethodsUtilizing over 4 years of data, the incidence of MRSA decolonization of consecutive total knee and hip arthroplasties, as well as the rates of infection of patients uncolonized, colonized with successful decolonization, and unsuccessful decolonization were evaluated. Utilizing these data, cost data, and known infection rate utilizing povidone-iodine decolonization, a cost analysis model was developed.ResultsOf the 5584 cases with MRSA data at a single institution, only 3.5% tested positive for intranasal MRSA. Of those patients, 69% were successfully decolonized. Of the 3864 cases with infection data, 21 sustained a surgical site infection within 90 days (0.54%). Of these patients, all tested negative for intranasal MRSA initially and therefore did not undergo the decolonization protocol. The cost analysis predicts a potential savings of $74.72 per patient at our institution to use a global intranasal povidone-iodine protocol prior to total joint arthroplasty.ConclusionEven with a lower incidence of MRSA than typically reported, utilization of intranasal povidone-iodine would potentially save $74.42 per patient.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

35 keywords...

hide…