• World Neurosurg · Jul 2020

    Increased rate of successful first passage recanalization during mechanical thrombectomy for M2 Occlusion.

    • Humain Baharvahdat, Yinn Cher Ooi, Kasra Khatibi, Lucido L Ponce Mejia, Naoki Kaneko, May Nour, Viktor Szeder, Reza Jahan, Satoshi Tateshima, Fernando Vinuela, Gary Duckwiler, and Geoffrey Colby.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
    • World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul 1; 139: e792-e799.

    BackgroundMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion. However, the true safety and efficacy of MT in medium-size vessel occlusions such as the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery have yet to be completely defined. In this study, we analyze the safety and efficacy of MT in M2 occlusions compared with M1 occlusions.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed of patients with AIS secondary to M1 and M2 occlusions between 2011 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were 1) AIS secondary to M1 or M2 occlusion, 2) MT performed by stentrieval technique alone, aspiration technique, or combined stentrieval-aspiration techniques. Basic patient characteristics, number of passages, first passage recanalization success (≥TICI [Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia] grade 2b), total recanalization success, hemorrhagic complications (including intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH] and subarachnoid hemorrhage), and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups.ResultsTwo hundred and sixty patients met the inclusion criteria; 171 patients had M1 occlusion versus 89 with M2 occlusion. First passage recanalization success rate was significantly higher in the M2 group (55.1% vs. 39.2%; P = 0.015). Total recanalization success rate was higher in the M2 group but did not reach significance (83% vs. 75%; P = 0.128). Subarachnoid hemorrhage rate was significantly higher in the M2 group (25% vs. 12%; P = 0.010) but there was no difference for ICH complications (14.6% vs. 16.4%; P = 0.711).ConclusionsMT for M2 occlusions has similar overall efficacy to that for M1 occlusions, but with higher first-pass successful recanalization rates. MT for M2 occlusions has a higher risk of associated subarachnoid hemorrhage.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.