• Burns · Nov 2020

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of the efficacy of silver-based antimicrobial burn dressings in a porcine model of burn wounds.

    • Joseph A Ross, Nick Allan, Merle Olson, Crystal Schatz, P Nick Nation, Justin Peter Gawaziuk, Japandeep Sethi, Song Liu, and Sarvesh Logsetty.
    • Chinook Contract Research Inc., Airdrie, Alberta, Canada.
    • Burns. 2020 Nov 1; 46 (7): 1632-1640.

    PurposeA variety of silver-based antimicrobial dressings are available on the market and are commonly used to prevent infection. Such prophylaxis is particularly important in treating burns, yet there is a paucity of evidence confirming the efficacy of commercially available dressingsin vivo. We describe here an in vivo porcine model of burns, which we use to test the antimicrobial efficacy of three common wound dressings and a control.ProceduresDomestic Yorkshire-cross pigs were medicated for pain management before inflicting burns with a heated brass rod. The wounds were artificially challenged with a mixture of two pathogens commonly associated with burn wound infection:Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The following dressing materials were sutured in place: gauze, nanocrystalline silver, silver-plated nylon, and polyethylene/polyester coated with high-oxidation silver salts. After 1 and 3 days, the wounds were assessed for erythema, swelling, and re-epithelialization, tissue was biopsied to determine the recovery of the challenge microorganisms, and histology was performed. We also examined the number of microorganisms present on the dressings themselves.ResultsHistology indicated that 30 s was sufficient to produce burns extending into the deep dermal layer. After 3 days, nanocrystalline silver and silver-plated nylon led to slightly reduced swelling relative to simple gauze, although none of the dressings significantly affected erythema or wound re-epithelialization. All the dressings led to decreased recovery of the challenge organisms from the burn tissue, relative to simple gauze. However, the magnitude of the reduction was greatest for nanocrystalline silver (log10 reduction = 4-5); additionally, only nanocrystalline silver gave a statistically significant decrease (P = 0.02). Notably, the antimicrobial effect for all dressings was reduced by Day 3 relative to Day 1. Similar trends were observed for microbial retention on the dressings themselves.ConclusionNanocrystalline silver-based wound dressings generally outperformed silver-plated nylon and high-oxidation silver salts in thisin vivo model of burn wounds. Relative to prophylactic use, it may be advisable to change the dressings more frequently when treating an infected wound.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.