• J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. · May 2017

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of the landmark and ultrasound methods in cesarean sections performed under spinal anesthesia on obese pregnants.

    • Aykut Urfalioğlu, Bora Bilal, Gözen Öksüz, Murat Bakacak, Ömer Faruk Boran, and Hafize Öksüz.
    • a Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation , and.
    • J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2017 May 1; 30 (9): 1051-1056.

    AbstractDifficulties in the palpation of anatomical landmarks in pregnancy due to obesity may create problems in the regional anaesthesia. Objective of this study was to compare ultrasound examination carried out before the procedure with conventional spinal anaesthesia method with papation of bony landmarks in caesarean sections performed under spinal anaesthesia in obese pregnants. Ninety-seven obese pregnants having pre- and post-pregnancy body mass index > 30 kg/m2 were prospectively examined. Patients were randomised to two groups as landmark group (n = 49) and ultrasound group (n = 48). The needle insertion point was determined at L4-L5 level before the procedure through palpation in the landmark group and with the examination in the ultrasound. The numbers of skin punctures and needle passes, total procedure time (TPT) and spinal block occurrence time (SBOT) were recorded. TPT was significantly longer in the ultrasound than in the landmark group (p < 0.001) (8 ± 2 and 5 ± 1; respectively). Whereas SBOT values were similar (p = 0.063). The numbers of skin punctures and needle passes were significantly fewer in the ultrasound than in the landmark group (p < 0.001). We believe that, accurate determination of the needle introducing site before the procedure by viewing the vertebral structures through ultrasound examination in obese pregnants could increase the success rate.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.