-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Dec 2020
Accuracy and Trending Ability of Blood Pressure and Cardiac Index Measured by ClearSight System in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction.
- Hiroko Kanazawa, Takuma Maeda, Erika Miyazaki, Naoshi Hotta, Shinya Ito, and Yoshihiko Ohnishi.
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
- J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2020 Dec 1; 34 (12): 3293-3299.
ObjectivesTo investigate the accuracy and trending ability of ClearSight (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) in patients with reduced ejection fraction (<55%) undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery by comparing the ClearSight-derived cardiac index (CICS) with the cardiac index measured with thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter. In addition, the accuracy and trending ability of ClearSight for blood pressure measurement was investigated by comparing the mean arterial pressure (MAP) derived by ClearSight (MAPcs) with invasive intra-arterial pressure.DesignProspective clinical study.DesignCardiac surgery operating room in a single cardiovascular center.ParticipantsThe study comprised 20 patients who underwent elective CABG surgery.InterventionsMAP and cardiac index were measured simultaneously at 6 time points intraoperatively. Trending ability was investigated at the following 2 points: (1) before and after placing the patient in the Trendelenburg position and (2) before and after atrial pacing with a targeted heart rate increase of 20%.Measurements And Main ResultsBland-Altman analysis showed that the percentage error between CICS and the cardiac index measured with thermodilution was 40.2% and the percentage error between MAPcs and MAP was 24.6%. Four-quadrant plot analysis showed that the tracking ability of CICS with the Trendelenburg position and atrial pacing was below the good trending ability cutoff (92%). However, the concordance rate of the 4-quadrant plot analysis showed a good trending ability for MAPcs. The polar plot analysis showed the same trend.ConclusionsCICS was not sufficiently accurate in patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing off-pump CABG surgery. However, ClearSight was clinically acceptable for MAP regarding its accuracy and trending ability in patients with reduced ejection fraction.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.