• O Rubio, A Estella, L Cabre, I Saralegui-Reta, M C Martin, L Zapata, M Esquerda, R Ferrer, A Castellanos, J Trenado, and J Amblas.
• Cuidados Intensivos, Althaia, Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Barcelona, España. Electronic address: orubio@althaia.cat.
• Med Intensiva. 2020 Oct 1; 44 (7): 439-445.

AbstractIn view of the exceptional public health situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, a consensus work has been promoted from the ethics group of the Spanish Society of Intensive, Critical Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), with the objective of finding some answers from ethics to the crossroads between the increase of people with intensive care needs and the effective availability of means.In a very short period, the medical practice framework has been changed to a 'catastrophe medicine' scenario, with the consequent change in the decision-making parameters. In this context, the allocation of resources or the prioritization of treatment become crucial elements, and it is important to have an ethical reference framework to be able to make the necessary clinical decisions. For this, a process of narrative review of the evidence has been carried out, followed by a unsystematic consensus of experts, which has resulted in both the publication of a position paper and recommendations from SEMICYUC itself, and the consensus between 18 scientific societies and 5 institutes/chairs of bioethics and palliative care of a framework document of reference for general ethical recommendations in this context of crisis.© 2020 Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.

39 keywords...

hide…