• Hans-Peter Piepho.
• Bioinformatics Unit, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany. hans-peter.piepho@uni-hohenheim.de.
• Bmc Med Res Methodol. 2014 May 10; 14: 61.

BackgroundNetwork meta-analysis can be used to combine results from several randomized trials involving more than two treatments. Potential inconsistency among different types of trial (designs) differing in the set of treatments tested is a major challenge, and application of procedures for detecting and locating inconsistency in trial networks is a key step in the conduct of such analyses.MethodsNetwork meta-analysis can be very conveniently performed using factorial analysis-of-variance methods. Inconsistency can be scrutinized by inspecting the design × treatment interaction. This approach is in many ways simpler to implement than the more common approach of using treatment-versus-control contrasts.ResultsWe show that standard regression diagnostics available in common linear mixed model packages can be used to detect and locate inconsistency in trial networks. Moreover, a suitable definition of factors and effects allows devising significance tests for inconsistency.ConclusionFactorial analysis of variance provides a convenient framework for conducting network meta-analysis, including diagnostic checks for inconsistency.

17 keywords...

hide…