• G Zick, C Eimer, J Renner, T Becher, M Kott, D Schädler, N Weiler, and G Elke.
• Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
• Anaesthesist. 2020 Jul 1; 69 (7): 489-496.

BackgroundAfter insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) the catheter position must be controlled and a pneumothorax ruled out.ObjectiveThe aim was to examine whether the use of two standard acoustic windows known from emergency sonography examination techniques is feasible to 1) verify the correct intravenous localization and direction of the guidewire before final CVC insertion and 2) correctly predict the required CVC length for positioning of the catheter tip in the lower third of the superior vena cava.Material And MethodsThis single center prospective observational study included adult patients (age ≥18 years) with an indication for CVC insertion after institutional ethics approval was obtained. Puncture sites were restricted to bilateral internal jugular and subclavian veins and except for duplicate examinations no further exclusion criteria were defined. After vessel puncture and insertion of the guidewire, the vena cava was displayed by an additional ultrasound examiner (sector scanner 1.5-3.6 MHz) using the transhepatic or subcostal acoustic window to localize the guidewire. For positioning of the CVC tip, the required catheter length in relation to the cavoatrial junction was measured using the guidewire marks during slow retraction and consecutive disappearance of the J‑shaped guidewire tip from each acoustic window. From the resulting insertion length of the guidewire 4 cm was subtracted for the transhepatic and 2 cm for the subcostal window under the assumption that this length correlates to the distance from the cavoatrial junction. The CVC was finally inserted and a chest radiograph was performed for radiological verification of the CVC position.ResultsOf 100 included patients, 94 could finally be analyzed. The guidewire could be identified in the vena cava in 91 patients (97%) within a time period of 2.2 ± 1.9 min. In three patients, the wire could not be visualized, although two catheters had the correct position, while one catheter was incorrectly positioned in the opposite axillary vein. In the second study part, positioning of the CVC was evaluated in 44 of the 94 patients. In 5 of these 44 patients, the correct direction and disappearance of the guidewire from the acoustic window could also be reliably visualized; however, with the left subclavian vein as the puncture site, the respective catheters were up to 6 cm too short for correct positioning. Thus, these 5 patients were excluded from this analysis. In the remaining 39 patients, the position of the CVC tip was optimally located in the lower third of the superior vena cava according to the chest radiograph in 20 patients (51%), while it was relatively too high in 5 patients (13%) and too low (entrance of the right atrium) in 9 patients. In the other 5 patients, disappearance of the guidewire from the acoustic window was not definitely detectable.ConclusionThe presented intraprocedural ultrasound-based method using two standard acoustic windows is reliable for verification of the correct intravenous location and direction of the guidewire even before dilatation of the vessel puncture site for insertion of the catheter. Furthermore, the method allows the clinically acceptable measurement of the required length for catheter positioning. A chest radiograph can be waived provided the ultrasound examination (identification of the guidewire and exclusion of puncture-related complications such as pneumothorax) is unambiguous.

32 keywords...

hide…