-
Palliative medicine · Sep 2013
End-of-life decisions for people with intellectual disabilities, an interview study with patient representatives.
- Annemieke M A Wagemans, Henny M J Van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, Ireen M Proot, Job Metsemakers, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, and Leopold M G Curfs.
- Maasveld, Koraalgroep, Maastricht, the Netherlands. ama.wagemans@maastrichtuniversity.nl
- Palliat Med. 2013 Sep 1;27(8):765-71.
BackgroundNot much is known about the process of end-of-life decision-making for people with intellectual disabilities.AimTo clarify the process of end-of-life decision-making for people with intellectual disabilities from the perspective of patient representatives.DesignA qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews, recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Grounded Theory procedures.ParticipantsWe interviewed 16 patient representatives after the deaths of 10 people with intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands.ResultsThe core category 'Deciding for someone else' describes the context in which patient representatives took end-of-life decisions. The patient representatives felt highly responsible for the outcomes. They had not involved the patients in the end-of-life decision-making process, nor any professionals other than the doctor. The categories of 'Motives' and 'Support' were connected to the core category of 'Deciding for someone else'. 'Motives' refers to the patient representatives' ideas about quality of life, prevention from suffering, patients who cannot understand the burden of interventions and emotional reasons reported by patient representatives. 'Support' refers to the support that patient representatives wanted the doctors to give to them in the decision-making process.ConclusionsFrom the perspective of the patient representatives, the process of end-of-life decision-making can be improved by ensuring clear roles and an explicit description of the tasks and responsibilities of all participants. Regular discussion between everyone involved including people with intellectual disabilities themselves can improve knowledge about each other's motives for end-of-decisions and can clarify expectations towards each other.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.