-
- H-T Klemm, M Forchert, and S Piontek.
- Freies Institut für medizinische Begutachtungen Bayreuth/Erlangen (FIMB), Ludwigstraße 25, 95444, Bayreuth, Deutschland. dr.klemm@fimb.de.
- Unfallchirurg. 2020 Jul 1; 123 (7): 580-586.
AbstractIt is not infrequent for physicians or lawyers who only occasionally deal with medical expert opinions to have difficulty understanding terms used in a legal context. A question of proof relating to consequences of an accidental injury can refer to the accidental injury itself and it seems relatively unknown that the term accident can apply to both the event and the damage/harm to health. The special situations with mental injuries (psychotrauma) are not dealt with in this article.This article explains the concepts and terms that are frequently used in relation to questions of causality and explains the fundamentals of medical causality assessment, from the viewpoint of both medical expertise and law. The focus is on private and public accident insurance, but the law relating to accidents at work of public officials and liability are also considered.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..