• A R Heller and T Koch.
• Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland. axel.heller@uk-augsburg.de.
• Anaesthesist. 2020 Oct 1; 69 (10): 702-711.

AbstractCritical incidents in hospitals can often be predicted hours before the event and can mostly be detected earlier and presumably avoided. Quality management programs from US hospitals to reduce deaths following a severe postoperative complication (failure to rescue, FTR), have in this form not yet become established in Germany. A sensitive score-based early warning system for looming complications is decisive for successful in-hospital emergency management. In addition to measurement rounds where the frequency is adapted to the severity, this includes effective communication of the results to the ward physician, who in the best case scenario solves the problem alone. If the deployment of a medical rapid response emergency team (MET) is necessary, there must be clear chain of alarm pathways and the personnel on the ward must be able to take initial bridging action until the MET arrives. The MET provides 24/7 emergency and intensive medical expertise for peripheral wards and must be familiar with the location, well-equipped and trained. Communication skills are particularly required not only to be able to handle the immediate emergency situation but also to organize the downstream diagnostics and escalation of treatment; however, the MET is only one of the links in the in-hospital rescue chain, which can only improve the patient outcome when alerted in a timely manner. Feedback systems, such as participation in the German Resuscitation Registry, allow reflection of one's own performance in a national comparison. The chances offered by a MET will only be fully realized when it is integrated into an in-hospital emergency concept and this determines the added value for patient safety.

12 keywords...

hide…