• Vinuta Vidyanand Vastrad, Sridevi Mallanna Mulimani, Dayanand Gurubasappa Talikoti, and Vijaya M Sorganvi.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Shri B. M. Patil Medical College and Hospital, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.
• Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jan 1; 13 (1): 163-168.

BackgroundAxillary brachial plexus block (ABPB) is safest among other methods of brachial plexus block because of its ease and reliability. The two approaches of ultrasonography-guided ABPB are perivascular (PV) and perineural (PN).AimsThis study was conducted to compare primary outcomes such as performance time, onset of the block, number of needle passes, block success rate, duration of sensory and motor block, and complications between ultrasound-guided PV and PN ABPB in patients posted for upper limb surgeries.Settings And DesignThis prospective randomized study was conducted on 106 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II posted for forearm, wrist, and hand surgeries, who were allotted into Group PV and Group PN 53 each.Materials And MethodsIn both methods, 20 mL of the drug was used. To start with, musculocutaneous nerve was blocked with 5 mL of the drug. In the PV technique, remaining 15 mL of the drug was deposited anterior and posterior to axillary artery, and in PN technique, 5 mL of the drug was injected around radial, ulnar, and median nerve.Statistical AnalysisMann-Whitney and Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.ResultsSignificant difference was observed between the two groups in performance time (PV - 8.647 ± 0.54 min and PN - 14.53 ± 0.20 min), onset time (PV - 19.48 ± 2.83 min and PN - 13.86 ± 1.81 min), and number of needle passes (PV - 2.30 ± 0.50 and PN - 4.91 ± 0.66). Other parameters were comparable in both the groups.ConclusionsUltrasound-guided PV axillary plexus block is better than PN axillary plexus block with respect to performance time and number of needle passes; but onset time was shorter in PN block, with precaution eliminating the risk of complications.

3 keywords...

hide…