• Marcus Redaèlli, Maren Cizmowski, Horst Christian Vollmar, Miguel Tamayo, Arim Shukri, Stephanie Stock, and August Wilhelm Bödecker.
• Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und klinische Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Köln.
• Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 2020 May 1; 145 (9): e50-e60.

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to illustrate motives for a GP's branch from the current point of view by branch (expectations fulfilled) and before branch (motivation). In addition, obstructive or beneficial factors of a branch should be identified.MethodsUsing a mixed-methods approach (focus groups, individual interviews) with the target group were used in the qualitative part of experiences, opinions and motivations for the GP's branch and, after evaluation, a pre-tested questionnaire was used. A full survey of 675 identified GPs from the database of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians North Rhine was carried out. These had settled in the last 5 years before the survey period (09/2015). The questionnaire sent by post contained 17 questions on settlement motivation and 11 biographical aspects.ResultsThe number of evaluable data records was 437 (64.7 %). The highest approval values, in the sense of conducive to settlement motivation, were "discontinuation of services in the hospital" (97.2 %) and "being one's own boss" (96.2 %). Rights and duties as a "panel physician" (8.5 %), and the "emergency service for panel physicians/on-call service" (22.7 %) were perceived as more of an obstacle. In terms of fulfilling expectations, the "discontinuation of services" (95.6 %) and the "diversity of age groups to be treated" (88.9 %) emerged. A total of 97 % would settle down again, regardless of the degree to which their wishes were fulfilled, and almost ¾ would only decided to work as family doctors after they had completed their studies.ConclusionsThe fact that escaping from the stationary sector is the main driving force behind the settlement must be thought-provoking. Since this survey approach was not based on specialist groups or the level of training, but on a complete survey of established persons over a five-year period, it can be stated that the current incentive structures of a branch should be rethought due to the age structure of the interviewees.© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

19 keywords...

hide…