• Eur. J. Clin. Invest. · May 2020

    Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicted clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease.

    • Ya-Ling Yang, Cheng-Hsueh Wu, Pai-Feng Hsu, Su-Chan Chen, Shao-Sung Huang, Wan Leong Chan, Shing-Jong Lin, Chia-Yu Chou, Jaw-Wen Chen, Ju-Pin Pan, Min-Ji Charng, Ying-Hwa Chen, Tao-Cheng Wu, Tse-Min Lu, Po-Hsun Huang, Hao-Min Cheng, Chin-Chou Huang, Shih-Hsien Sung, Yenn-Jiang Lin, and Hsin-Bang Leu.
    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Healthcare and Management Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
    • Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2020 May 1; 50 (5): e13230.

    BackgroundThis study examines the predictive value of a novel systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.MethodsA total of 5602 CAD patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled. They were divided into two groups by baseline SII score (high SII vs low SII) to analyse the relationship between SII groups and the long-term outcome. The primary outcomes were major cardiovascular events (MACE) which includes nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke and cardiac death. Secondary outcomes included a composite of MACE and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.ResultsAn optimal SII cut-off point of 694.3 × 109 was identified for MACE in the CAD training cohort (n = 373) and then verified in the second larger CAD cohort (n = 5602). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a higher SII score (≥694.3) was independently associated with increased risk of developing cardiac death (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.43-2.86), nonfatal MI (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.09-1.85), nonfatal stroke (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.28-2.99), MACE (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.36-2.01) and total major events (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.32-1.77). In addition, the SII significantly improved risk stratification of MI, cardiac death, heart failure, MACE and total major events than conventional risk factors in CAD patients by the significant increase in the C-index (P < .001) and reclassification risk categories by significant NRI (P < .05) and IDI (P < .05).ConclusionsSII had a better prediction of major cardiovascular events than traditional risk factors in CAD patients after coronary intervention.© 2020 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.