• Ann. Intern. Med. · Jul 2020

    Factors Influencing Physician Practices' Adoption of Behavioral Health Integration in the United States: A Qualitative Study.

    • Angèle Malâtre-Lansac, Charles C Engel, Lea Xenakis, Lindsey Carlasare, Kathleen Blake, Carol Vargo, Christopher Botts, Peggy G Chen, and Mark W Friedberg.
    • RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.).
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2020 Jul 21; 173 (2): 92-99.

    BackgroundBehavioral health integration is uncommon among U.S. physician practices despite recent policy changes that may encourage its adoption.ObjectiveTo describe factors influencing physician practices' implementation of behavioral health integration.DesignSemistructured interviews with leaders and clinicians from physician practices that adopted behavioral health integration, supplemented by contextual interviews with experts and vendors in behavioral health integration.Setting30 physician practices, sampled for diversity on specialty, size, affiliation with parent organizations, geographic location, and behavioral health integration model (collaborative or co-located).Participants47 physician practice leaders and clinicians, 20 experts, and 5 vendors.MeasurementsQualitative analysis (cyclical coding) of interview transcripts.ResultsFour overarching factors affecting physician practices' implementation of behavioral health integration were identified. First, practices' motivations for integrating behavioral health care included expanding access to behavioral health services, improving other clinicians' abilities to respond to patients' behavioral health needs, and enhancing practice reputation. Second, practices tailored their implementation of behavioral health integration to local resources, financial incentives, and patient populations. Third, barriers to behavioral health integration included cultural differences and incomplete information flow between behavioral and nonbehavioral health clinicians and billing difficulties. Fourth, practices described the advantages and disadvantages of both fee-for-service and alternative payment models, and few reported positive financial returns.LimitationThe practice sample was not nationally representative and excluded practices that did not implement or sustain behavioral health integration, potentially limiting generalizability.ConclusionPractices currently using behavioral health integration face cultural, informational, and financial barriers to implementing and sustaining behavioral health integration. Tailored, context-specific technical support to guide practices' implementation and payment models that improve the business case for practices may enhance the dissemination and long-term sustainability of behavioral health integration.Primary Funding SourceAmerican Medical Association and The Commonwealth Fund.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…