-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Dec 2013
Comparative Study Observational StudyPrediction of Responsiveness to an Intravenous Fluid Challenge in Patients After Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Comparison Between Arterial Pulse Pressure Variation and Digital Plethysmographic Variability Index.
- Marc-Olivier Fischer, Arnaud Pelissier, Dan Bohadana, Jean-Louis Gérard, Jean-Luc Hanouz, and Jean-Luc Fellahi.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU de Caen, Caen, France; Department of Cardiology, CHU de Caen, Caen, France. Electronic address: fischer-mo@chu-caen.fr.
- J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.. 2013 Dec 1;27(6):1087-93.
ObjectivesArterial pulse pressure variation (PPV) and digital plethysmographic variability index (PVI) have been proposed to predict fluid responsiveness during anesthesia and in critically ill patients. The present study aimed to compare the clinical utility of PPV and PVI in predicting fluid responsiveness after elective cardiac surgery.DesignA prospective observational study.SettingA university hospital.ParticipantsEighty-seven adult patients.InterventionsAdmission to the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery. Investigation before and after fluid challenge.Measurements And Main ResultsThe discrimination of both PPV and PVI in predicting fluid responsiveness was compared by using areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (ROCAUC). Sensibility analyses were conducted after exclusion of patients with a low perfusion index, patients receiving norepinephrine, and patients with right ventricular dysfunction. Fifty-seven (71%) patients were responders and twenty-three (29%) were nonresponders. ROCAUC were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.63-0.83] versus 0.60 [95% CI: 0.48-0.71] for PPV and PVI in the whole cohort of patients, respectively (p = 0.020). The inconclusive class of responses included 47 (59%) and 62 (77%) patients, respectively (p = 0.010); whereas the discrimination of PVI remained low whatever the subgroup of patients, the discrimination of PPV markedly increased in patients without perfusion index ≤ 1.3 (ROCAUC = 0.83 [95% CI: 0.68-0.93]) and in patients without right ventricular dysfunction (ROCAUC = 0.85 [95% CI: 0.67-0.95]).ConclusionsPVI is not discriminant and probably inaccurate to predict fluid responsiveness after elective cardiac surgery. PPV could be of potential interest after exclusion of patients with a low perfusion index and right ventricular dysfunction.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.