• Luigi Villa, Oliver Matz, Karmele Olaciregui Dague, David Kluwig, Rolf Rossaint, and Jörg Christian Brokmann.
• Emergency Department, University Hospital, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule [RWTH] Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
• Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 1; 15 (7): 1275-1279.

AbstractThe aim of the study was to examine the feasibility and safety of telemedicine for dermatological emergency patients in the emergency department. This observational study was monocentric, open, prospective and two-arm randomized [control group (n = 50) and teledermatology group (n = 50)]. The control group was conventionally recruited directly by a dermatologist. In the teledermatology group patients, images of the skin lesions and clinical parameters were transferred to a tablet PC (personal computer) by an emergency physician and telemedically assessed by a dermatologist without patient contact. Subsequently, the dermatologist, who was previously telemedically contacted, then personally examined the patient in the emergency department. The treatment time between the control group and the teledermatology group was also recorded and compared. The agreement in suspected diagnosis between teledermatological evaluation and clinical evaluation of the same physician in the teledermatology group was 100%. The treatment time [mean (minutes) ± standard deviation] of the control group was 151 ± 71, that of the teledermatology group was 43 ± 38 (p < 0.001). The use of emergency telemedicine is safe and effective and provides a viable alternative for clinical care of emergency patients.

15 keywords...

hide…