-
- Joshua R Lakin, Margaret G Robinson, Ziad Obermeyer, Brian W Powers, Susan D Block, Rebecca Cunningham, Joseph M Tumblin, Christine Vogeli, and Rachelle E Bernacki.
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA. jlakin@partners.org.
- J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug 1; 34 (8): 1467-1474.
BackgroundCommunication about priorities and goals improves the value of care for patients with serious illnesses. Resource constraints necessitate targeting interventions to patients who need them most.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a clinician screening tool to identify patients for a communication intervention.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingPrimary care clinics in Boston, MA.ParticipantsPrimary care physicians (PCPs) and nurse care coordinators (RNCCs) identified patients at high risk of dying by answering the Surprise Question (SQ): "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 2 years?"MeasurementsPerformance of the SQ for predicting mortality, measured by the area under receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.ResultsSensitivity of PCP response to the SQ at 2 years was 79.4% and specificity 68.6%; for RNCCs, sensitivity was 52.6% and specificity 80.6%. In univariate regression, the odds of 2-year mortality for patients identified as high risk by PCPs were 8.4 times higher than those predicted to be at low risk (95% CI 5.7-12.4, AUC 0.74) and 4.6 for RNCCs (3.4-6.2, AUC 0.67). In multivariate analysis, both PCP and RNCC prediction of high risk of death remained associated with the odds of 2-year mortality.LimitationsThis study was conducted in the context of a high-risk care management program, including an initial screening process and training, both of which affect the generalizability of the results.ConclusionWhen used in combination with a high-risk algorithm, the 2-year version of the SQ captured the majority of patients who died, demonstrating better than expected performance as a screening tool for a serious illness communication intervention in a heterogeneous primary care population.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.