• Audrey L Jones, Michael J Fine, Roslyn A Stone, Shasha Gao, Hausmann Leslie R M LRM Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. , Kelly H Burkitt, Peter A Taber, Galen E Switzer, Chester B Good, Megan E Vanneman, and Susan L Zickmund.
• Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS), Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Audrey.Jones3@va.gov.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1; 34 (9): 1925-1933.

BackgroundThe 2014 Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act (i.e., "Choice") allows eligible Veterans to receive covered health care outside the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. The initial implementation of Choice was challenging, and use was limited in the first year.ObjectiveTo assess satisfaction with Choice, and identify reasons for satisfaction and dissatisfaction during its early implementation.Design And ParticipantsSemi-structured telephone interviews from July to September 2015 with Choice-eligible Veterans from 25 VA facilities across the USA.Main MeasuresSatisfaction was assessed with 5-point Likert scales and open-ended questions. We compared ratings of satisfaction with Choice and VA health care, and identified reasons for satisfaction/dissatisfaction with Choice in a thematic analysis of open-ended qualitative data.ResultsOf 195 participants, 35 had not attempted to use Choice; 43 attempted but had not received Choice care (i.e., attempted only); and 117 attempted and received Choice care. Among those who attempted only, a smaller percentage were somewhat/very satisfied with Choice than with VA health care (17.9% and 71.8%, p < 0.001); among participants who received Choice, similar percentages were somewhat/very satisfied with Choice and VA health care (66.6% and 71.1%, p = 0.45). When asked what contributed to Choice ratings, participants who attempted but did not receive Choice care reported poor access (50%), scheduling problems (20%), and care coordination issues (10%); participants who received Choice care reported improved access (27%), good quality of care (19%), and good distance to Choice provider (16%). Regardless of receipt of Choice care, most participants expressed interest in using Choice in the future (70-82%).ConclusionsAccess and scheduling barriers contributed to dissatisfaction for Veterans unsuccessfully attempting to use Choice during its initial implementation, whereas improved access and good care contributed to satisfaction for those receiving Choice care. With Veterans' continued interest in using services outside VA facilities, subsequent policy changes should address Veterans' barriers to care.

18 keywords...

hide…