• J Gen Intern Med · Nov 2019

    Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening for Women With Down Syndrome: a Collaborative Modeling Study.

    • Oguzhan Alagoz, Ali Hajjar, Sarocha Chootipongchaivat, Nicolien T van Ravesteyn, Jennifer M Yeh, Mehmet Ali Ergun, Harry J de Koning, Brian Chicoine, and Barry Martin.
    • Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. alagoz@engr.wisc.edu.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1; 34 (11): 2374-2381.

    BackgroundWomen with Down syndrome have a lower breast cancer risk and significantly lower life expectancies than women without Down syndrome. Therefore, it is not clear whether mammography screening strategies used for women without Down syndrome would benefit women with Down syndrome in the same way.ObjectiveTo determine the benefits and harms of various mammography screening strategies for women with Down syndrome using collaborative simulation modeling.DesignTwo established Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) simulation models estimated the benefits and harms of various screening strategies for women with Down syndrome over a lifetime horizon.ParticipantsWe modeled a hypothetical cohort of US women with Down syndrome who were born in 1970.InterventionsAnnual, biennial, triennial, and one-time digital mammography screenings during the ages 40-74.Main MeasuresThe models estimated numbers of mammograms, false-positives, benign biopsies, breast cancer deaths prevented, and life-years gained per 1000 screened women when compared with no screening.Key ResultsIn average-risk women 50-74, biennial screening incurred 122 mammograms, 10 false-positive mammograms, and 1.4 benign biopsies per one life-year gained compared with no screening. In women with Down syndrome, the same screening strategy incurred 2752 mammograms, 242 false-positive mammograms, and 34 benign biopsies per one life-year gained compared with no screening. The harm/benefit ratio varied for other screening strategies, and was most favorable for one-time screening at age 50, which incurred 1629 mammograms, 144 false-positive mammograms, and 20 benign biopsies per one life-year gained compared with no screening.ConclusionsThe harm/benefit ratios for various mammography screening strategies in women with Down syndrome are not as favorable as those for average-risk women. The benefit of screening mammography for women with Down syndrome is less pronounced due to lower breast cancer risk and shorter life expectancy.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.