-
- Catherine R Butler, Elizabeth K Vig, Ann M O'Hare, Chuan-Fen Liu, Paul L Hebert, and Wong Susan P Y SPY Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. .
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. cathb@nephrology.washington.edu.
- J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1; 35 (4): 1035-1043.
BackgroundUnderstanding ethical concerns that arise in the care of patients with advanced kidney disease may help identify opportunities to support medical decision-making.ObjectiveTo describe the clinical contexts and types of ethical concerns that arise in the care of patients with advanced kidney disease.DesignRetrospective cohort study.ParticipantsA total of 28,568 Veterans with advanced kidney disease between 2000 and 2009 followed through death or 2011.ExposureClinical scenarios that prompted clinicians to consider an ethics consultation as documented in the medical record.Main MeasuresDialysis initiation, dialysis discontinuation, receipt of an intensive procedure during the final month of life, and hospice enrollment.Key ResultsPatients had a mean age of 67.1 years, and the majority were male (98.5%) and white (59.0%). Clinicians considered an ethics consultation for 794 patients (2.5%) over a median follow-up period of 2.7 years. Ethical concerns involved code status (37.8%), dialysis (54.5%), other invasive treatments (40.6%), and noninvasive treatments (61.1%) and were related to conflicts between patients, their surrogates, and/or clinicians about treatment preferences (79.3%), who had authority to make healthcare decisions (65.9%), and meeting the care needs of patients versus obligations to others (10.6%). Among the 20,583 patients who died during follow-up, those for whom clinicians had considered an ethics consultation were less likely to have been treated with dialysis (47.6% versus 62.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.74), more likely to have discontinued dialysis (32.5% versus 20.9%, aOR 2.07, CI 1.61-2.66), and less likely to have received an intensive procedure in the last month of life (8.9% versus 18.9%, aOR 0.41, CI 0.32-0.54) compared with patients without documentation of clinicians having considered consultation.ConclusionsClinicians considered an ethics consultation for patients with advanced kidney disease in situations of conflicting preferences regarding dialysis and other intensive treatments, especially when these treatments were not pursued.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.