-
- Joy L Lee, Susan M Rawl, Stephanie Dickinson, Evgenia Teal, Layla B Baker, Chen Lyu, Will L Tarver, and David A Haggstrom.
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. joyllee@iu.edu.
- J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1; 35 (9): 2614-2620.
BackgroundAlthough growing, the prevalence of the use of health information technology (HIT) by patients to communicate with their providers is not well understood on the population level, nor whether patients are communicating with their providers about their use of HIT.ObjectiveTo understand whether patients are communicating with their providers about HIT use and the patient characteristics associated with the communication.DesignCross-sectional, self-administered survey of a sample of patients across the state of Indiana.ParticipantsNine hundred seventy adult participants from across Indiana, 54% female and 79.5% white.Main MeasuresThe survey included sections assessing health information-seeking behavior, use of health information technology, and discussions with doctors about the use of HIT.Key ResultsThe survey had a 12% response rate. Sixty-three percent of respondent reported going to the Internet as the first source when seeking health information, while only 19% of respondent reported their doctor was their first source. When communicating with doctors electronically, 31% reported using an electronic health record messaging system, 24% used email, and 18% used text messaging. Only 39% of respondents reported having had any conversation about HIT use with their providers.ConclusionsThere remain many unmet opportunities for patients and providers to communicate about HIT use. More guidance for patients and care teams may both help facilitate these conversations and promote optimal use, such as recommendations to ask simple clarification questions and minimize inefficient, synchronous communication when unnecessary.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.