• Am J Prev Med · Jul 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    The Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities Program 2.0: An RCT Examining Effects on Simple 7.

    • Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler, David Strogatz, Meredith L Graham, Galen D Eldridge, Grace A Marshall, Sara C Folta, Kristin Pullyblank, Miriam E Nelson, and Lynn Paul.
    • Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas; Department of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. Electronic address: r.seguin-fowler@ag.tamu.edu.
    • Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul 1; 59 (1): 324032-40.

    IntroductionRural women have higher rates of cardiovascular disease than their nonrural counterparts, partially because of their social and environmental contexts. The study objective is to test a refined version of the multilevel Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities intervention, which used extensive process and outcome evaluation data from the original randomized trial to optimize effectiveness as measured by improved Simple 7 score, a composite measure of cardiovascular disease risk.Study DesignThe intervention was implemented in a 6-month, delayed intervention, community-randomized trial; control participants received the program following 24-week outcome assessment. The study was conducted in 2017-2018; data analysis occurred in 2018-2019.Setting/ParticipantsThe study was conducted in 11 rural, medically underserved towns in New York. Participants were women aged ≥40 years who were either (1) obese or (2) overweight and sedentary.InterventionThe intervention group received 24 weeks of hour-long, twice-weekly classes including strength training, aerobic exercise, and skill-based nutrition- and health-related education, as well as civic engagement activities focused on healthy food and physical activity environments.Main Outcome MeasuresMeasures included weight and height; blood pressure; blood cholesterol; blood glucose; and self-reported smoking, diet, and physical activity behaviors. Individual Simple 7 components were examined, and mixed linear regression analyses were used to examine change in Simple 7 score.ResultsA total of 182 participants were randomized. Compared with control participants, the intervention group had greater improvements in Simple 7 score (difference=1.03, 95% CI=0.44, 1.61, p<0.001) and 3 of the Simple 7 components (physical activity, healthy diet score, and BMI).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of rigorously evaluating programs in real-world community settings and, when appropriate, revising and retesting interventions to optimize dissemination potential.Trial RegistrationThis study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03059472.Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…