• Thomas R O'Neill, Michael R Peabody, Keith L Stelter, James C Puffer, and John E Brady.
• From The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (TRO, MRP, JCP); University of Minnesota Mankato Family Medicine Residency Program, Mankato, MN (KLS); Tidewater Physicians Multispecialty Group, Newport News, VA (JEB). toneill@theabfm.org.
• J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Nov 1; 32 (6): 876-882.

PurposeTo demonstrate the degree to which the American Board of Family Medicine's certification examination is representative of family physician practice with regard to frequency of diagnoses encounter and the criticality of the diagnoses.MethodsData from 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used to assess the frequency of diagnoses encountered by family physicians nationally. These diagnoses were also rated by a panel of content experts for how critical it was to diagnose and treat the condition correctly and then assign the condition to 1 of the 16 content categories used on the American Board of Family Medicine examination. These ratings of frequency and criticality were used to create 7 different new schemas to compute percentages for the content categories.ResultsThe content category percentages for the 7 different schemas correlated with the 2006 to 2016 test plan percentages from 0.50 to 0.90 with the frequency conditions being more highly correlated and the criticality conditions being less correlated.ConclusionsThis study supports the continued use of the current Family Medicine Certification Examination content specifications as being representative of current family medicine practice; however, small adjustments might be warranted to permit better representation of the criticality of the topics.© Copyright 2019 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

29 keywords...

hide…