• J Am Board Fam Med · Mar 2020

    Review

    Prognostic Indices for Advance Care Planning in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

    • Peter Kim, Jeanette M Daly, Maresi A Berry-Stoelzle, Megan E Schmidt, LeAnn C Michaels, David A Dorr, and Barcey T Levy.
    • From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA (PK, JMD, MAB-S, MES, BTL); Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA (BTL); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (LCM); Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR (DAD).
    • J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Mar 1; 33 (2): 322-338.

    BackgroundPatient identification is an important step for advance care planning (ACP) discussions.ObjectivesWe conducted a scoping review to identify prognostic indices potentially useful for initiating ACP.MethodsWe included studies that developed and/or validated a multivariable prognostic index for all-cause mortality between 6 months and 5 years in community-dwelling adults. PubMed was searched in October 2018 for articles meeting our search criteria. If a systematic review was identified from the search, we checked for additional eligible articles in its references. We abstracted data on population studied, discrimination, calibration, where to find the index, and variables included. Each index was further assessed for clinical usability.ResultsWe identified 18 articles with a total of 17 unique prognostic indices after screening 9154 titles. The majority of indices (88%) had c-statistics greater than or equal to 0.70. Only 1 index was externally validated. Ten indices, 8 developed in the United States and 2 in the United Kingdom, were considered clinically usable.ConclusionOf the 17 unique prognostic indices, 10 may be useful for implementation in the primary care setting to identify patients who may benefit from ACP discussions. An index classified as "clinically usable" may not be easy to use because of a large number of variables that are not routinely collected and the need to program the index into the electronic medical record.© Copyright 2020 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.