The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology
-
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol · May 1996
Comparative StudyA comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour.
A prospective study was conducted to compare the accuracy of visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) at delivery with laboratory determination of measured blood loss (MBL). It showed that EBL tends to be clouded by the conventional teaching that blood loss at delivery is usually between 200 to 300 mL. ⋯ Of the 9 women with a primary postpartum haemorrhage, only one was correctly diagnosed as such and 3 women were estimated to have blood losses of at least 500 mL but the measured blood losses were all lower. It was concluded that visual estimation of blood loss is inaccurate, especially at the extremes of MBL and that primary postpartum haemorrhage is not detected by visual estimation of blood loss, unless there are associated signs of haemodynamic instability.
-
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol · May 1996
Case ReportsCardiopulmonary arrest in pregnancy: successful resuscitation of mother and infant following immediate caesarean section in labour ward.
Our patient experienced cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to profound hypotension and was unable to be resuscitated with external cardiac massage and assisted ventilation. This case demonstrates the need for continued vigilance by medical and nursing staff when epidural anaesthesia is being established. Resuscitation equipment should be available in the labour ward as cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate Caesarean section can be lifesaving in the event of a cardiopulmonary arrest.
-
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol · May 1996
A study of patients' acceptance towards vaginal birth after caesarean section.
Patients' acceptance towards vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) was studied in 99 women with previous Caesarean section. Their attitude was strongly related to the chance of success of VBAC. ⋯ The major caused of a negative feeling towards the previous Caesarean section were postoperative pain and a long recovery period. There was no significant negative effect on acceptance of VBAC if the previous Caesarean section was performed as an emergency operation for slow progress of labour or cephalopelvic disproportion.