Respiratory physiology & neurobiology
-
Respir Physiol Neurobiol · Oct 2013
High tidal volume ventilation does not exacerbate acid-induced lung injury in infant rats.
The impact of mechanical ventilation with high V(T)-low PEEP in infant rats with preinjured lungs is unknown. After tracheal instillation of saline or acid, two week old rats were ventilated with V(T) 7 mL/kg and PEEP 5 cm H₂O or V(T) 21 mL/kg and PEEP 1cm H₂O for 4 h. Airway resistance and the coefficient of tissue elastance, measured via low-frequency forced-oscillation technique, and quasi-static pressure-volume curves deteriorated less with high V(T)-low PEEP when compared with low V(T)-high PEEP. ⋯ Moreover, differences in BALF protein concentration and histological lung injury scores were independent of applied ventilation strategies. In contrast to experimental studies with adult rats, short-term mechanical ventilation with high V(T)-low PEEP is not deleterious when compared to low V(T)-high PEEP in both healthy and pre-injured infant rat lungs. Our results call for caution when extrapolating data from adult studies and highlight the need for age-specific animal models.
-
Respir Physiol Neurobiol · Oct 2013
Corrections of Enghoff's dead space formula for shunt effects still overestimate Bohr's dead space.
Dead space ratio is determined using Enghoff's modification (VD(B-E)/VT) of Bohr's formula (VD(Bohr)/VT) in which arterial is used as a surrogate of alveolar PCO₂. In presence of intrapulmonary shunt Enghoff's approach overestimates dead space. In 40 lung-lavaged pigs we evaluated the Kuwabara's and Niklason's algorithms to correct for shunt effects and hypothesized that corrected VD(B-E)/VT should provide similar values as VD(Bohr)/VT. ⋯ Uncorrected VD(B-E)/VT (mean ± SD of 0.70 ± 0.10) overestimated VD(Bohr)/VT (0.59 ± 0.12) (p < 0.05), over the entire range of shunts. Mean (K) VD(B-E)/VT was significantly higher than VD(Bohr)/VT (0.67 ± 0.08, bias -0.085, limits of agreement -0.232 to 0.085; p < 0.05) whereas (N)VD(B-E)/VT showed a better correction for shunt effects (0.64 ± 0.09, bias 0.048, limits of agreement -0.168 to 0.072; p < 0.05). Neither Kuwabara's nor Niklason's algorithms were able to correct Enghoff's dead space formula for shunt effects.