European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
-
Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging · Nov 2002
Comparative Study Clinical TrialIs furosemide administration effective in improving the accuracy of determination of differential renal function by means of technetium-99m DMSA in patients with hydronephrosis.
It has been suggested that determination of differential renal function (DRF)using technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) may lead to overestimation of the function of an obstructed kidney in patients with excretion abnormalities owing to pelvic retention of DMSA. Recently published guidelines have recommended use of furosemide injection when calculating DRF in these particular patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of diuretic administration on the determination of DRF using DMSA scintigraphy. ⋯ When we compared DRF values obtained from standard and from diuretic DMSA studies, the mean of the differences was only 0.3% and the SD was only 1.2%. There was also no significant difference in DRF between patients with the obstructive curve pattern and those with a dilated renogram curve pattern (with washout of activity during the second phase of the study) ( P>0.1). In conclusion, we did not observe interference from pelvicalyceal activity in patients with documented pelvic retention and infer that diuretic administration may be a useless intervention for improving the accuracy of determination of DRF.
-
Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging · Nov 2002
Comparative Study Clinical TrialAutomatic determination of brain perfusion index for measurement of cerebral blood flow using spectral analysis and 99mTc-HMPAO.
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) can be non-invasively quantified using the brain perfusion index (BPI), determined from radionuclide angiographic data generated by technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime ((99m)Tc-HMPAO). We previously reported the use of a spectral analysis (SA) method using (99m)Tc-HMPAO to calculate the BPI. In this report, we demonstrate an automatic method for determining the optimal BPI value and compare the optimal BPI values with the absolute CBF values measured using H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography (PET). ⋯ The difference between BPI and the optimal BPI increased significantly from 4.87%+/-1.69% to 18.38%+/-3.93% (mean+/-SD) when the Err value increased. The optimal BPI value ( y) was well correlated with the mCBF(PET) value ( x) ( y=0.21 x-0.0075, r=0.800). Our results suggest that this automatic SA method provides an accurate estimate of BPI that can be used for the quantification of CBF using (99m)Tc-HMPAO SA.