Neurocritical care
-
The purpose of the study is to review the CT findings associated with ventriculostomy placement in regards to the safety of an EVD plus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) for IVH. ⋯ Intraventricular rt-PA appears to be relatively safe especially when all EVD fenestrations are within the ventricle and reduces IVH burden similar to other studies. We describe a CT-based EVD tract hemorrhage grading scale to evaluate EVD tract hemorrhage before and after thrombolysis, and a bone-window technique to evaluate EVD fenestrations prior to IVH thrombolysis. Further research is needed evaluating these imaging techniques in regard to intraventricular thrombolytic safety and EVD tract hemorrhage.
-
Use of antiepileptic drugs (AED's) is common in the neurocritical care setting. However, there remains a great deal of controversy regarding the optimal agent. Studies associating the prophylactic use of AED's with poor outcomes are heavily biased by the prevalent use of phenytoin, an agent highly associated with deleterious effects. In the current study, we evaluate lacosamide for neuroprotective properties in a murine model of closed head injury. ⋯ Administration of lacosamide improves functional performance, and reduces histological evidence of acute neuronal injury and neuroinflammation in a murine model of closed head injury. Lacosamide effects appear to be mediated via a reduction or delay in the acute inflammatory response to injury. Prior clinical and animal studies have found antiepileptic treatment following injury to be detrimental, though these studies are biased by the common use of older medications such as phenytoin. Our current results as well as prior work on levetiracetam suggest the newer AED's may be beneficial in the setting of acute brain injury.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A prospective evaluation of labetalol versus nicardipine for blood pressure management in patients with acute stroke.
Acute hypertension is common following stroke and contributes to poor outcomes. Labetalol and nicardipine are often used for acute hypertension but there are little data comparing the two. This study is to evaluate the therapeutic response and tolerability of these two agents following acute stroke. ⋯ In acutely hypertensive stroke patients, superior therapeutic response was achieved with nicardipine versus labetalol. Despite this, there was no demonstrable difference in clinical outcomes.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The oxygen reactivity index and its relation to sensor technology in patients with severe brain lesions.
The oxygen reactivity index (ORx) has been introduced to assess the status of cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Currently, there is some controversy about whether the ORx depends on the type of PbrO2-sensor technology used for its calculation. To examine if the probe technology does matter, we compared the ORx and the resulting optimal cerebral perfusion pressures (CPPopt) of simultaneously implanted Licox (CC1.SB, Integra Neuroscience, France) and Neurovent-PTO (Raumedic, Germany) probes in patients after aneurysmal SAH or severe TBI. ⋯ Owing to the rather limited number of patients, we view the results of this study as preliminary. The main result is that Licox and Raumedic showed consistent differences in ORx and CPPopt. Therefore, ORx values of both probes cannot be interchanged and should not be viewed as equivalent. This should be taken into consideration when discussing ORx data generated by different PbrO2 probe types.
-
Seizures are common after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) but their impact on outcome is uncertain and prophylactic anti-convulsant use is controversial. We hypothesized that seizures would not increase the risk of in-hospital mortality in a large administrative database. ⋯ A secondary diagnosis of seizure after ICH was not associated with increased in-hospital death overall or in any of the pre-specified subgroups; however, there may be residual confounding by severity. These findings do not support a need for routine prophylactic anti-epileptic drug use after ICH.