Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
-
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg · Aug 2014
Observational StudyAtrial apoptosis and fibrosis adversely affect atrial conduit, reservoir and contractile functions.
Chronic atrial volume overload and atrial fibrillation (AF) induce structural changes within atrial myocardium. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adverse cellular remodelling on echocardiographic strain rate (SR) deformation indices of atrial contractile, conduit and reservoir functions. ⋯ Atria exhibiting greater fibrotic and apoptotic burdens had impaired conduit, reservoir and contractile function, as evaluated by deformation imaging. Among patients with chronic LA volume overload, exposure to long-standing persistent AF induced more pronounced degrees of adverse atrial cellular remodelling. Strain-rate descriptors of atrial reservoir function harboured potential to predict atrial fibrosis and apoptosis.
-
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg · Jul 2014
ReviewDoes off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery have a beneficial effect on long-term mortality and morbidity compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery offered superior long-term outcomes compared with on-pump CABG surgery. Best evidence papers were considered to be those that had a follow-up period of ≥5 years, had >50 patients in either cohort, did not utilize concomitant interventions nor comprised low-risk, high-risk or sub-population groups. ⋯ Other long-term indicators such as cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events or neuro-psychological outcomes were similar between the two groups. Despite these conclusions, the evidence is limited by substantial variability in patient selection and study methods. The CORONARY (coronary artery bypass surgery off- or on-pump revascularization study) trial recently presented results, which showed no significant differences in composite outcomes at 1 year; it will be interesting to observe whether these comparable outcomes are maintained for a much longer time frame.
-
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg · Jul 2014
ReviewWhat is the optimal revascularization technique for isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention?
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was, 'What is the optimal revascularization technique for isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in terms of patient survival, morbidity such as myocardial infarction (MI) and need for repeat target vessel revascularization: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft (MIDCAB) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)?' Altogether 504 papers were found using the reported search, of which 13 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Outcome parameters that were used in the assessment include the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular or cerebral events (MACCEs), mortality and the rate of repeat target vessel revascularization. ⋯ However, retrospective data have shown that average length of hospital stay was longer in the MIDCAB group (7.4 ± 3.2 vs 3.4 ± 3.5 days; P < 0.001). We conclude that there are obvious proven benefits with MIDCAB, namely in terms of a reduced need for repeat target vessel revascularization and incidence of MACCE, and one study has even shown that there is a long-term survival benefit in 'real-world' clinical practice. However, given that there is a lack of well-powered randomized controlled trial and long-term follow-up data to prove a mortality benefit in support of MIDCAB, patients requiring revascularization of isolated proximal LAD stenosis and being considered for percutaneous coronary intervention should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting prior to intervention.
-
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg · Jul 2014
ReviewIs the trocar technique for tube thoracostomy safe in the current era?
A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was, 'in adult patients who require a tube thoracostomy, is the trocar technique comparable to blunt dissection in terms of rate of tube malposition or complications?' Altogether more than 258 papers were found using the reported search, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers were tabulated. ⋯ A randomized prospective study in cadavers comparing blunt vs sharp tip trocars reported that the use of blunt tip trocars resulted in less complications. We conclude that the trocar technique for chest tube placement should be avoided in adult patients as it is associated with a higher incidence of malposition and complications. The blunt dissection technique with digital exploration of the pleural cavity prior to chest tube placement is the safest technique and should be considered standard practice.