Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
-
J. Thromb. Haemost. · Jan 2008
Fibrinolysis in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm with special emphasis on rupture and shock.
A ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is associated with high mortality. Postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, multiple organ failure, myocardial infarction, and thromboembolism are common. An active and balanced hemostatic system is essential to avoid bleeding as well as thrombosis. When these activities are not properly regulated the patient is at risk of developing either excessive bleeding or thrombosis-related complications. Previous studies have shown a state of activated coagulation in patients with ruptured AAA. However, there are conflicting results regarding the fibrinolytic response. ⋯ Our results indicate a state of activated coagulation in patients with a non-ruptured AAA, the state being intensified by rupture. The present data show normal fibrinolytic activities in patients with a non-ruptured AAA, but increased systemic fibrinolysis, as demonstrated by elevated tPAag level, in patients with a ruptured AAA. The elevated PAI-1 level indicates a simultaneous inhibition of the systemic fibrinolysis. Furthermore, the hyperfibrinolytic state was reinforced by shock in this study. However, the clinical outcome, with a relatively high incidence of thrombosis-related deaths, indicate a prothrombotic state instead of a hyperfibrinolytic state as a major point of attention in patients with shock as a result of a ruptured AAA.
-
J. Thromb. Haemost. · Jan 2008
Comparative StudyComparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
The revised Geneva score, a standardized clinical decision rule in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), was recently developed. The Wells clinical decision is widely used but lacks full standardization, as it includes subjective clinician's judgement. We have compared the performance of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule, and their usefulness for ruling out PE in combination with D-dimer measurement. ⋯ This study suggests that the performance of the revised Geneva score is equivalent to that of the Wells rule. In addition, it seems safe to exclude PE in patients by the combination of a low or intermediate clinical probability by the revised Geneva score and a normal D-dimer level. Prospective clinical outcome studies are needed to confirm this latter finding.