Circulation
-
Artificial ventilation is a cornerstone of basic life support-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BLS-CPR). Recent data corroborate clinical studies performed in the 1950s and 1960s, suggesting a need to change the present American Heart Association standards for artificial ventilation. These studies show that gastric insufflation followed by regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration are a major hazard of artificial ventilation with an unprotected airway. ⋯ These methods of ventilation predispose the victim to gastric insufflation. Alternative methods of ventilation with longer inspiratory time and thus lower flow rate and peak inspiratory pressure are suggested. Additionally, rescue personnel, particularly EMTs and paramedics, should be taught how to apply cricoid pressure to prevent gastric insufflation in victims with an unprotected airway.
-
The outcome from cardiopulmonary arrest in children in the prehospital and hospital setting is generally poor. The event that compromises the cardiac status is often respiratory embarrassment, and the presenting rhythms are often bradyarrhythmias and asystole. Emergency medical services (EMS) systems have primarily an adult focus and may not be organized to manage optimally the critically ill and injured child. ⋯ There are two levels of receiving facilities: Emergency Departments Approved for Pediatrics and Pediatric Critical Care Centers. The system is voluntary and has 85% of the hospitals in compliance with the guidelines. Early recognition of the prearrest state, improved training, and equipping of prehospital care personnel, development of EMS services for children, dissemination of an advanced pediatric life support course, as well as research in pediatric CPR may improve the outcome of resuscitation in the pediatric population.
-
Review
Special resuscitation situations: near drowning, traumatic injury, electric shock, and hypothermia.
Special resuscitation situations are cardiopulmonary arrests requiring modification or extension of conventional life support techniques. Significant controversy exists with regard to several aspects of special resuscitation, including whether or not there is a need to clear the airway of a near-drowning victim with the Heimlich maneuver and whether CPR should be initiated in an unmonitored hypothermic patient showing no signs of life. The previous standards and guidelines almost entirely neglected the management of cardiac arrest due to traumatic injury. The conference panel on Special Situations recommended that: the Heimlich maneuver should only be performed on near-drowning victims when the rescuer suspects that foreign matter is obstructing the airway or the victim fails to respond appropriately to mouth-to-mouth ventilation, further investigation is needed to better define the need for, the risks of, and the timing of the Heimlich in the near-drowning victim, there should be an expanded section in the standards and guidelines describing the differences in the management of a victim whose cardiac arrest is due to traumatic injury, CPR is indicated and should be done on a pulseless, unmonitored hypothermic patient in the field, but that a longer time to check for a pulse (up to one minute) may be required, and guidelines that the panel proposed be used for management of the underwater submersion victim in cardiac arrest.
-
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children is not well studied; many of the current recommendations for advanced pediatric life support (APLS) are based on anecdotal experience rather than scientific study. The following are unique issues in APLS requiring a consensus decision: What are the best methods of vascular access and of drug delivery and dosages? What constitutes minimal paramedic training and equipment? There are also many shared controversies between APLS and ACLS, including the use of calcium, epinephrine vs isoproterenol, methoxamine, and bicarbonate. This article presents the scientific basis for these controversial issues and highlights areas where information is lacking. A discussion of these questions generated a consensus on some issues and hopefully will stimulate further study to answer the questions that were raised.
-
Blood flow during closed-chest CPR may result from variations in intrathoracic pressure rather than selective compression of the cardiac ventricles. During chest compression, the thoracic and abdominal cavities are subjected to positive pressure fluctuations. It has been suggested that compression of the abdomen may improve left heart outflow during CPR by limiting diaphragmatic movement or improving venous return. ⋯ Selective abdominal binding also increases systolic pressures during CPR but does not improve subdiaphragmatic venous return. Although abdominal binding may increase common carotid flow, it has not been shown to improve cerebral or myocardial perfusion when compared with conventional CPR alone. These CPR adjunct techniques have not been shown to improve outcome from cardiac arrest and should remain experimental until further well-designed studies addressing regional vital organ flow and outcome of resuscitation are performed.